sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
Direct Tax »
 Direct taxes code draft law is likely to seek less power for the taxman
 CBDT extends deadline for filing ITRs with audit reports to Oct 15, 2018
 ITRs rising, but not tax collection Did cash ban help raise tax base?
 Notification No. 52 /2018 Central Board of Direct Taxes
 Tax relief! You don't have to pay income tax on this money gift
 No Due Date Extension..?? CBDT asks to file IT Returns and Tax Audit Reports before 30th September
 Here's how to get them Latest ITR forms ask for more income details:
 Notification Central Board Of Direct Taxes
 Life insurers seek separate investment window in income-tax deduction
 Taxpayers may lose this benefit Income tax returns (ITR) filing
 CBDT Notifies Rules for Computing Fair Market Value of Inventories converted to Capital Asset

Income tax department slams notice on five Mumbai-based exporters over offshore accounts
October, 12th 2016

The tax office has stumbled on a new can of worms.

About ten days ago, the investigation wing of the income-tax department slapped notices on at least five persons in Mumbai, asking them to disclose details of their offshore companies and financial structures in four tax havens — Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man and British Virgin Islands.

The notices were served under Section 131of the Income-Tax Act which relates to collection of evidence on undisclosed earnings.

The action has stunned the persons concerned and their financial advisers, who are trying to figure out how tax sleuths got the information. Unlike the Panama Papers or HSBC Geneva accounts, there has been no report till now of data leaks or anonymous hackers infiltrating servers of law firms, banks or other service providers in these tax havens. And even though India has entered into information-sharing pacts with these jurisdictions, the I-T department can obtain information from the tax havens only if it makes specific queries about an individual who is suspected to have violated tax laws in India.

“This is no fishing expedition. All the five people indeed have companies and trust structures in these places,” a person familiar with the development toldET.

All five are exporters
“But so far, none of them (the five people concerned) has faced tax surveys, raids or investigation-…The I-T department has somehow got the information but we don’t know the source. This has caused panic among many who did not come clean under last year’s black money scheme. Since the information is not based on leaked data, the accused cannot defend himself on the grounds that the information is stolen and therefore not tenable in a court of law,” the person told ET.

Once a person responds to the department’s notice, he would be summoned to the tax office where his statement would be recorded on oath.

“All the five individuals who received notices are exporters of commodities and manufactured goods. The money parked abroad is typically shown as commission income that is supposed to have been paid to foreign middlemen who assist in bagging export orders. However, in most cases the middlemen are just front companies of exporters. It’s a ploy to escape tax by parking some funds abroad,” said a senior lawyer who has advised the department in similar violations of tax and foreign currency rules.

Income tax department slams notice on five Mumbai-based exporters over offshore accounts

While the recipients of the recent tax notices had disclosed some of their overseas bank accounts and assets acquired legitimately (under Reserve Bank of India’s liberalised remittance scheme) in their tax returns, none of them had revealed their holdings in the four tax havens mentioned in the department’s letters.

No mention
Significantly, in the offshore companies set up in Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man and British Virgin Islands, the names of these five individuals do not even appear as shareholders of the firms.

“The shares are held by nominees who had entered into agreements with these persons. The nominees act as fronts of these ultimate beneficial owners, or UBOs, as they call them. These details are only available with their tax haven service providers. Even banks where the companies have accounts may not be aware of UBOs,” said a senior tax practitioner.

Among many wealthy Indians and non-resident Indians, destinations such as Jersey and Guernsey have been preferred tax havens for decades due to their secrecy, sophisticated service providers, expertise in handling discretionary trusts, tax benefit in purchase of UK properties and close association with banks and law firms in London.

“Also, Indians travelling to London could keep visits to these islands a secret as there are no separate records of the visits in their passports. It’s like a foreigner landing in Delhi and travelling to Bengaluru,” said a lawyer.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions