sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 All India Federation of Tax Practitioners vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)
 Cromption Greaves Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Modiluft Ltd.
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.

M/s Syndicate Labels,6-E, Rani Jhansi Road, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi. Vs. Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Circle-38(1),New Delhi.
October, 23rd 2015
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                               `SMC-1' : NEW DELHI
                   DELHI BENCH `SMC-

            BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                        ITA No.4386/Del/2014
                                        2008-09
                      Assessment Year : 2008-


M/s Syndicate Labels,          Vs.    Assistant Commissioner of
6-E, Rani Jhansi Road,                Income Tax,
Jhandewalan Extension,                Circle-38(1),
                                      Circle-
New Delhi.                            New Delhi.
      AAXFS1523P.
PAN : AAXFS1523P.

     (Appellant)                          (Respondent)


             Appellant by       :    Shri Niren Gupta, CA.
             Respondent by      :    Shri K.K. Jaiswal, Senior DR.

                                ORDER



      This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated
12.06.2014 passed by the ld. CIT(A) confirming penalty of `4,06,009/-
imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act,
1961 in relation to assessment year 2008-09.


2.    Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee claimed
deduction in respect of certain payments made to M/s Maersk India
Pvt.Ltd. The Assessing Officer observed that such payments totalling
`11,94,498/- were made without deduction of tax at source.            He,
therefore, invoked the provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act by
holding that the assessee ought to have deducted tax at source.
Resultantly, addition was made for the sum which constituted bedrock
for the imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.       The learned
                                       2                        ITA-4386/Del/2014







CIT(A) upheld this penalty. The assessee is aggrieved against the
confirmation of this penalty.


3.    After   considering   rival    submissions   and    perusing    relevant
material on record, it is observed that the instant penalty has been
imposed only in respect of disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) of the Act. The
assessee entertained a bona fide belief about the non-deduction of tax
at source from the amount paid to M/s Maersk India Pvt. Ltd. on the
basis of a Circular, as per which, the foreign shipping companies and
their agents were governed by the provisions of Section 172 and not
by Section 194C of the Act.         Though it is an admitted fact that the
assessee made the payment to a resident but the fact remains that
principal of M/s Maersk India Pvt. Ltd., being M/s A.P. Moller-Maersk
A/S, Denmark, was given 100% DIT relief, copy of which letter issued
by the office of Deputy Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)
dated 23.04.2007, has been placed on record.             These facts indicate
that the assessee was under a bona fide belief that the amount paid to
M/s Maersk India Pvt. Ltd. was not liable for deduction of tax at source.
Be that as it may, I am concerned with the imposition and confirmation
of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act which presupposes concealment of
income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.            Here is a
case in which the assessee neither concealed any income nor
furnished inaccurate particulars. Deduction on account of M/s Maersk
India Pvt.Ltd. was claimed after making due payments. The dispute is
only about deduction or non-deduction of tax at source from payments
to M/s Maersk India Pvt.Ltd. for which disallowance has been made u/s
40(a)(ia) of the Act. Under no circumstance can such a disallowance
be brought within the ambit of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.                The
assessee made a proper disclosure about the expense claimed by it as
deduction which was neither bogus nor otherwise non-deductible but
                                    3                         ITA-4386/Del/2014


for the application of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Overturning the
impugned order, I order for the deletion of the instant penalty.







4.    In the result, the appeal is allowed.
      Decision pronounced in the open Court on 21st October, 2015.


                                                       Sd/-
                                                  (R.S. SYAL)
                                              ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated : 21.10.2015
VK.

Copy forwarded to: -

1.                              Labels,
      Appellant : M/s Syndicate Labels,
                 6-E, Rani Jhansi Road, Jhandewalan Extension,
                 New Delhi.

2.    Respondent : Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
                   Circle-
                   Circle-38(1), New Delhi.
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT

                               Assistant Registrar
                                   4                    ITA-4386/Del/2014




Date of dictation                                      20.10.2015
Date on which the typed draft is placed before   the   20.10.2015
dictating Member
Date on which the typed draft is placed before   the
Other Member
Date on which the approved draft comes to        the
Sr.PS/PS
Date on which the fair order is placed before    the
Dictating Member for pronouncement
Date on which the fair order comes back to       the
Sr.PS/PS
Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk
Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk
The date on which the file goes to the Assistant
Registrar for signature on the order
Date of dispatch of the Order
*

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Team

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions