Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: cpt :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

Harjit Singh Chadha, C-348, Defence Colony, New Delhi 110 024 vs. DCIT, Central Circle-23, ARA Centre, Jhandewalan Extn., New Delhi 55
October, 28th 2015
                     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL

                       DELHI BENCH "SMC-2": NEW DELHI

                   BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                              ITA No. 2094/Del/2014
                                  A.Y. : 2009-10

Harjit Singh Chadha,                                  vs.   DCIT, Central Circle-23,
C-348, Defence Colony,                                      ARA Centre,
New Delhi ­ 110 024                                         Jhandewalan Extn.,
(PAN : AADPC4802B)                                          New Delhi ­ 55


(Appellant)                                                         (Respondent)

                     Assessee by             :        Sh. Adhir K. Samal, CA & Ms.
                                                      Apporva Bhardwaj, CA
                     Department by       :            Sh. Sujit Kumar, Sr. DR


                           Date of Hearing : 26-10--2015
                           Date of Order             : 26-10-2015


                                        ORDER
      This appeal by the Assessee            is directed against the Order of the Ld.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXIII, New Delhi                   dated 27.12.2013
pertaining to assessment year 2009-10.

2.    The grounds of appeal read as under:-

              1.     That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law while upholding the addition
                     made by the AO in respect of gift received by assessee from his
                     father in law of Rs. 2,96,590/- by ignoring the submissions of
                     the assessee and provisions of section 56(2)(vi) of the Income





                                                 1
                    Tax Act, 1961 and as such the addition of Rs. 2,96,590/- may
                    please be deleted.

             2.     That the assessee crave to add, alter, delete, modify or
                    withdraw any of the above grounds at the time of hearing.

3.    The facts narrated by the revenue authorities are not disputed by both the
parties, therefore, the same are not repeated here for the sake of convenience.

4.    At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel for the Assessee stated that the Revenue
has not given sufficient opportunity to the assessee for          producing the Bank
Statement of the donor establishing Fund Flow through the Banking channel. He
further stated that the assessee is having all documentary evidences for
substantiating his claim before the Revenue Authorities and requested for one more
opportunity to substantiate the claim of the assessee.

5.    Ld. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below and stated that
sufficient opportunity was provided by them to the assessee.

6.    I have heard both the parties and perused the orders passed by the Revenue
Authorities alongwith relevant records available with the Appeal filed.            I find
considerable cogency in the submissions of the assessee that Revenue has not given
sufficient opportunity to the assessee for producing the Bank Statement of the donor
establishing Fund Flow through the Banking channel.          I also find that now the
assessee is having all documentary evidences for substantiating his claim before the
Revenue Authorities and hence, his request for seeking one more opportunity to
substantiate the claim of the assessee before the Assessing Officer seems to be
genuine. Therefore, in the interest of justice, I remit back the issues in dispute to the


                                           2
file of the Assessing Officer to consider the same afresh, after considering all the
documents viz. Bank Statement of the Donor and Fund Flow through Banking
Channel etc. The Assesee is also directed to fully cooperate with the AO and
produced all the documents before the AO to substantiate his claim.    Needless to
add that the assessee should be given adequate opportunity of being heard.




7.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical

purposes.

       Order pronounced in the Open Court on 26/10/2015.

                                                                       Sd/-

                                                                     [H.S. SIDHU]
                                                               JUDICIAL MEMBER
Date: 26/10/2015
SRBhatnagar
Copy forwarded to: -
1.    Appellant    2.    Respondent     3.   CIT   4.CIT (A)     5.    DR, ITAT
                                TRUE COPY                        By Order,




                                        Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches




                                         3
4

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Web Application Development Web based Software Solution Web Application Deployment Web Application Solutions Web Application Software Development Web Application Deployment Web Application Programming Web Application Design and Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions