Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

DHL Logistics Pvt Limited, 201A, Silver Utopia, Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakala, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400059 Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir. 9(3)(1), Mumbai.
October, 12th 2015
                  ,   "                         " 
     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "K" BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE HON'BLE S/SHRI JOGINDER SINGH (JM), AND B.R.BASKARAN (AM)
  ,    ..,  
                     Stay Application No.266/Mum/2015
                arising out of I.T.A. No.1030/Mum/2015
              (   / Assessment Year : 2010-11)

 DHL Logistics Pvt Limited,      /        Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,
 201A, Silver Utopia,            Vs.      Cir. 9(3)(1),
 Cardinal Gracias Road,                   Mumbai.
 Chakala, Andheri (E),
 Mumbai-400059
        ( /Appellant)            ..       ( / Respondent)

                ./   ./ PAN: AAACM6824H



            / Applicant by            :   Shri Madhur Agarwal
            /Respondent by :              Shri Samir Tekniwal


            / Date of Hearing                : 9.10.2015
            /Date of Pronouncement : 9.10.2015


                                / O R D E R


Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:


       The assessee has filed this Stay Application, seeking extension of
stay granted by this Bench of the Tribunal in SA No.65/Mum/2015 dated
13.3.2015.


2.     The ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the
assessee has duly complied with the terms of the stay granted earlier by
paying a sum of Rupees One crore. The ld. Counsel further submitted that
the hearing of appeal could not be concluded for the reasons that the
Revenue sought time on two occasions and the Bench adjourned the
                                       2                        SA No.266/M/2015









matter on one occasion. Further, on last occasion, the case was adjourned
to 7.12.2015 in order to wait for the order of the DRP with whom the
assessee had filed a rectification application.      Accordingly, the ld.    AR
submitted that the hearing could not be concluded due to reasons beyond
the control of the assessee. Accordingly, the ld.AR prayed that the stay
granted by the Tribunal may kindly be extended.

3.     The ld. DR did not dispute the factual aspects presented by the ld.
AR.

4.     We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record.
Having regard to the submissions made by the ld. AR, we are of the view
that the stay already granted by this Bench of the Tribunal deserves
extension. Accordingly, the stay granted earlier is extended for a further
period of six months from the date of this order or till the date of disposal
of the appeal, whichever period expires earlier. We make it clear that the
assessee should not seek adjournment without a reasonable cause on the
date of hearing, failing which the present stay order is subjected to review
by the Division Bench hearing the appeal.







5.     In the result, the stay application of the assessee is allowed.


       The above order was pronounced in the open court on 9th Oct, 2015.

            9 , Oct, 2015    
             th


      Sd                                        sd
( )                                               (..)
(JOGINDER SINGH )                                (B.R.BASKARAN)
 /Judicial Member                   /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


 Mumbai: 9th Oct, 2015.

.../ SRL , Sr. PS
                           3                SA No.266/M/2015




    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.    / The Respondent.
3.    () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.     / CIT concerned
5.    ,   ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.


                                          / BY ORDER,

      True copy                      (Asstt. Registrar)
                                 ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting