Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

DHL Logistics Pvt Limited, 201A, Silver Utopia, Cardinal Gracias Road, Chakala, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400059 Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir. 9(3)(1), Mumbai.
October, 12th 2015
                  ,   "                         " 

  ,    ..,  
                     Stay Application No.266/Mum/2015
                arising out of I.T.A. No.1030/Mum/2015
              (   / Assessment Year : 2010-11)

 DHL Logistics Pvt Limited,      /        Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,
 201A, Silver Utopia,            Vs.      Cir. 9(3)(1),
 Cardinal Gracias Road,                   Mumbai.
 Chakala, Andheri (E),
        ( /Appellant)            ..       ( / Respondent)

                ./   ./ PAN: AAACM6824H

            / Applicant by            :   Shri Madhur Agarwal
            /Respondent by :              Shri Samir Tekniwal

            / Date of Hearing                : 9.10.2015
            /Date of Pronouncement : 9.10.2015

                                / O R D E R

Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

       The assessee has filed this Stay Application, seeking extension of
stay granted by this Bench of the Tribunal in SA No.65/Mum/2015 dated

2.     The ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the
assessee has duly complied with the terms of the stay granted earlier by
paying a sum of Rupees One crore. The ld. Counsel further submitted that
the hearing of appeal could not be concluded for the reasons that the
Revenue sought time on two occasions and the Bench adjourned the
                                       2                        SA No.266/M/2015

matter on one occasion. Further, on last occasion, the case was adjourned
to 7.12.2015 in order to wait for the order of the DRP with whom the
assessee had filed a rectification application.      Accordingly, the ld.    AR
submitted that the hearing could not be concluded due to reasons beyond
the control of the assessee. Accordingly, the ld.AR prayed that the stay
granted by the Tribunal may kindly be extended.

3.     The ld. DR did not dispute the factual aspects presented by the ld.

4.     We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record.
Having regard to the submissions made by the ld. AR, we are of the view
that the stay already granted by this Bench of the Tribunal deserves
extension. Accordingly, the stay granted earlier is extended for a further
period of six months from the date of this order or till the date of disposal
of the appeal, whichever period expires earlier. We make it clear that the
assessee should not seek adjournment without a reasonable cause on the
date of hearing, failing which the present stay order is subjected to review
by the Division Bench hearing the appeal.

5.     In the result, the stay application of the assessee is allowed.

       The above order was pronounced in the open court on 9th Oct, 2015.

            9 , Oct, 2015    

      Sd                                        sd
( )                                               (..)
(JOGINDER SINGH )                                (B.R.BASKARAN)
 /Judicial Member                   /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

 Mumbai: 9th Oct, 2015.

.../ SRL , Sr. PS
                           3                SA No.266/M/2015

    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.    / The Respondent.
3.    () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.     / CIT concerned
5.    ,   ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.

                                          / BY ORDER,

      True copy                      (Asstt. Registrar)
                                 ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
E-catalogue online catalogue E-brochure online brochure online product catalogue online product catalogue e-catalogue Indi

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions