Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: TDS :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
 
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, come Tax, Central Circle- Central Circle-1, New Delhi. New Delhi. Vs. M/s Sankalp Agencies Pvt.Ltd., B-4, Vikas Apartments, 4, Vikas Apartments, 4, Vikas Apartments, 34/1, East Punjabi Bagh, 34/1, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.
October, 06th 2015
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                                `G' : NEW DELHI
                    DELHI BENCH `G

                             GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND
            BEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA,
                             KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
            SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT,

                       Nos.5738/Del/2013 & 5739/Del/2013
                   ITA Nos
                               Years : 2009-
                    Assessment Years             2010-11
                                       2009-10 & 2010-


Deputy Commissioner of           Vs.    M/s Sankalp Agencies Pvt.Ltd.,
Income
Income Tax,                             B-4, Vikas Apartments,
        Circle-1,
Central Circle-                         34/1, East Punjabi Bagh,
New Delhi.                              New Delhi.
                                        PAN : AABCS1612G.
     (Appellant)                            (Respondent)

             Appellant by         :    Shri Sujit Kumar, Senior DR.
             Respondent by        :    Shri A.K. Jain, CA.

      Date of hearing             :    30.09.2015
      Date of pronouncement       :    05.10.2015

                                  ORDER

         GUPTA, VP :
PER G.C. GUPTA,
      These two appeals by the Revenue for the assessment years
2009-10 & 2010-11 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-III,
New Delhi dated 14th August, 2013 and 16th August, 2013. These are
being disposed of with this consolidated order.





2.    At the outset, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that
the disputed tax effect in the present appeals of the Revenue is less
than `3 lakhs each, the monetary limit fixed by the CBDT for preferring
an appeal by the Department to the Tribunal. Learned DR could not
controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the assessee.


3.    We have considered the rival submissions and have perused the
order of the Assessing Officer and learned CIT(A).        We find that the
                                   2                   ITA-5738 & 5739/D/2013



disputed tax amount in each of these two appeals filed by the Revenue
being less than `3 lakhs, the monetary limit laid down by the CBDT for
preferring an appeal to the Tribunal by the Department, the present
appeals filed by the Revenue are not maintainable and, accordingly,
are dismissed.





4.    In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
      Decision pronounced in the open Court on 5th October, 2015.


                  Sd/-                               Sd/-
                   KANT)
       (OM PRAKASH KANT)                       (G.C. GUPTA)
                                               (G.C. GUPTA)
      ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                       VICE PRESIDENT

VK.

Copy forwarded to: -

1.    Appellant  : Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
                           Circle-1, New Delhi.
                   Central Circle-
2.    Respondent : M/s Sankalp Agencies Pvt.Ltd.,
                   B-4, Vikas Apartments,
                   34/1, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.

3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT

                             Assistant Registrar

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions