Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. (Formerly Known As(M/s Samvardhana Motherson Finance Ltd.)a Vs. Assitant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 22(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. M/s Frontline Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
 Ram Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Vs. St Microelectronics Private Ltd.
  The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 M/s Ess Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu) Vs. ESPN Software India Ltd.
 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax,
 ITO vs. Gymkhana Club (ITAT Chandigarh)
 SRD Nutrients Private Limited vs. CCE (Supreme Court)
 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption Vs. The Fertilizers Association Of India

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, come Tax, Central Circle- Central Circle-1, New Delhi. New Delhi. Vs. M/s Sankalp Agencies Pvt.Ltd., B-4, Vikas Apartments, 4, Vikas Apartments, 4, Vikas Apartments, 34/1, East Punjabi Bagh, 34/1, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.
October, 06th 2015
                                `G' : NEW DELHI
                    DELHI BENCH `G

                             GUPTA, VICE PRESIDENT AND
            BEFORE SHRI G.C. GUPTA,
                             KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                       Nos.5738/Del/2013 & 5739/Del/2013
                   ITA Nos
                               Years : 2009-
                    Assessment Years             2010-11
                                       2009-10 & 2010-

Deputy Commissioner of           Vs.    M/s Sankalp Agencies Pvt.Ltd.,
Income Tax,                             B-4, Vikas Apartments,
Central Circle-                         34/1, East Punjabi Bagh,
New Delhi.                              New Delhi.
                                        PAN : AABCS1612G.
     (Appellant)                            (Respondent)

             Appellant by         :    Shri Sujit Kumar, Senior DR.
             Respondent by        :    Shri A.K. Jain, CA.

      Date of hearing             :    30.09.2015
      Date of pronouncement       :    05.10.2015


         GUPTA, VP :
      These two appeals by the Revenue for the assessment years
2009-10 & 2010-11 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-III,
New Delhi dated 14th August, 2013 and 16th August, 2013. These are
being disposed of with this consolidated order.

2.    At the outset, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that
the disputed tax effect in the present appeals of the Revenue is less
than `3 lakhs each, the monetary limit fixed by the CBDT for preferring
an appeal by the Department to the Tribunal. Learned DR could not
controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the assessee.

3.    We have considered the rival submissions and have perused the
order of the Assessing Officer and learned CIT(A).        We find that the
                                   2                   ITA-5738 & 5739/D/2013

disputed tax amount in each of these two appeals filed by the Revenue
being less than `3 lakhs, the monetary limit laid down by the CBDT for
preferring an appeal to the Tribunal by the Department, the present
appeals filed by the Revenue are not maintainable and, accordingly,
are dismissed.

4.    In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
      Decision pronounced in the open Court on 5th October, 2015.

                  Sd/-                               Sd/-
       (OM PRAKASH KANT)                       (G.C. GUPTA)
                                               (G.C. GUPTA)
      ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                       VICE PRESIDENT


Copy forwarded to: -

1.    Appellant  : Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,
                           Circle-1, New Delhi.
                   Central Circle-
2.    Respondent : M/s Sankalp Agencies Pvt.Ltd.,
                   B-4, Vikas Apartments,
                   34/1, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.

3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR, ITAT

                             Assistant Registrar
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Vision

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions