Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: form 3cd
 
 
From the Courts »
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International

Asstt.Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Room No.27, 6th floor, Ashar I T Park, Wagale Industrial Estate, Road No.16Z, Thane (W)-400604 Vs. Shri Umraosingh Ostwal, A-1, Shanti Ganga, Opp, Railway Station, Bhayander East, Dist.Thane-401105
October, 30th 2015
                ,   "" 
     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL" F" BENCH, MUMBAI

     BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (AM) AND SANJAY GARG, (JM)
      ..,      ,                                       
                 /I.T.A. No.7486/Mum/2013
             (   / Assessment Year : 2007-08)
Asstt.Commissioner of Income    / Shri Umraosingh Ostwal,
Tax, Circle-2,                      A-1, Shanti Ganga,
Room No.27, 6th floor,
                                Vs.
                                    Opp, Railway Station,
Ashar I T Park,                     Bhayander East,
Wagale Industrial Estate,           Dist.Thane-401105
Road No.16Z,
Thane (W)-400604
       ( /Appellant)             ..     ( / Respondent)

        ./   ./PAN :AABPO9328N

            / Appellant by                Shri Abhinay Kumbhar
            / Respondent by               Shri Vimal Punmiya


             / Date of Hearing                    : 29.10.2015
             /Date of Pronouncement :29.10.2015

                             / O R D E R

Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

       The appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order dated
10.09.2013 passed by Ld CIT(A)-1, Thane for assessment year 2007-08.


2.     The ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the
impugned appellate order has been passed by Ld CIT(A) against the
assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.263 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 consequent to the revision order passed by the Commissioner of
Income Tax u/s 263 of the Act. He further submitted that the assessee
had challenged the revision order passed by Ld CIT by filing appeal before
                                     2                       ITA No.7486/Mum/2013






the ITAT and the Tribunal, vide its order dated 10.5.2013 passed in ITA
No.8857/Mum/2011 has set aside the revision order. Accordingly, the ld.
Counsel submitted that the assessment order passed by the AO and also
the appellate order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax do not
have independent legs to stand on its own. Accordingly, he submitted that
the appeal filed by the Revenue is liable to be dismissed.


3.    The ld. DR, on the contrary, submitted that the Revenue has
challenged the order passed by the Tribunal by filing appeal before the
High Court.


4.    Having heard the rival contentions, we find merit in the submissions
made by the ld.AR. Since the revision order passed by the Commissioner
has been set aside by the Tribunal, the impugned assessment order as
well as appellate order cannot survive on its own. Accordingly, the appeal
of the revenue is liable to be dismissed. We order accordingly.





5.   In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

      Pronounced accordingly in the open court on 29th Oct, 2015.

              th
            29 Oct, 2015    

       Sd                                          sd
     ( /SANJAY GARG)                     ( .. / B.R. BASKARAN)
  / JUDICIAL MEMBER                     / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
  Mumbai: 29 Oct, 2015
            th


.../ SRL , Sr. PS

    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.    / The Respondent.
3.    () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.     / CIT concerned
                             3               ITA No.7486/Mum/2013



5.    ,   ,                      /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.
                                              / BY ORDER,
          True copy
                                   (Asstt. Registrar)
                                   ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions