Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

Rajesh Pavithran, 202, Bliss, D Wing, Vasant Oscar, LBS Marg, Mulund West, Mumbai-400080 Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-38, Mumbai.
October, 10th 2014
                     ,                  ""          
       IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "D" BENCH, MUMBAI

BEFORE HON'BLE S/SHRI H.L. KARWA, PRESIDENT AND B.R.BASKARAN (AM)
         .. ,                              .. ,   

                      ./I.T.A. No.211/ Mum/2012
                   (   / Assessment Year :2007-08)

  Rajesh Pavithran,                 /       Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,
  202, Bliss, D Wing,               Vs.     Central Circle-38, Mumbai.
  Vasant Oscar, LBS Marg,
  Mulund West,
  Mumbai-400080
        ( /Appellant)                ..     (    / Respondent)


                ./I.T.A. Nos.1308 t o 1310/Mum/2012
            (   / Assessment Years :2004-05 t o 2006-07)

  Rajesh Pavithran,                 /       Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,
  202, Bliss, D Wing,               Vs.     Central Circle-38, Mumbai.
  Vasant Oscar, LBS Marg,
  Mulund West,
  Mumbai-400080.

        ( /Appellant)                ..     (    / Respondent)


          . /   . /PAN/GIR No. : AAZPN1547N

             / Assessee by            :    Shri Pradeep S Shetty
               / Revenue by :              Shri Santosh Kumar


              / Date of Hearing
                                                 : 9.9.2014
             /Date of Pronouncement : 12.9.2014

                                  / O R D E R

 Per B.R.BASKARAN, Accountant Member:

       All the four appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders
 passed by Ld CIT(A) and they relate to the assessment years 2004-05 to 2007-
 08. All these appeals were heard together and hence they are being disposed of
 by this common order, for the sake of convenience.
                                        2
                                                               I.T.A. No.211/Mum/2012
                                                                     I.T.A. Nos.1308 to
                                                                        13 10/M um /2012



2.     The department carried out search and seizure operations u/s 132 of the
Act at the residential premises of the assessee and consequent thereto the
present assessments were framed u/s 153A of the Act. The assessing officer
completed the assessments of the years under considerations by making various
types of additions. The assessee did not get favourable orders from Ld CIT(A)
and hence he has preferred these appeals before us.





3.     At the time of hearing, the Ld A.R submitted that the additions made in
these years consisted of additions made u/s 68, 69, 69C and disallowance of
certain expenses. He further submitted that the assessing officer has made the
above said additions, as the assessee could not furnish relevant details before
him. He further submitted that the assessee furnished all the details before Ld
CIT(A), but the first appellate authority refused to admit them and accordingly
confirmed the orders passed by the AO.       Accordingly, he submitted that the
assessee would be subjected to great prejudice, if the evidences furnished by the
assessee are not considered properly. Accordingly, he submitted that all the
issues urged before the Tribunal may be set aside to the file of the assessing
officer for considering them afresh.


4.     The Ld D.R did not object to the plea put forth by Ld A.R


5.     We heard the rival contentions and perused the record. The nature of
additions contested before us are given below:-
       Assessment year : 2004-05
              Unexplained gift                        - Rs.1,35,000/-
              Unexplained deposits made in bank       - Rs.1,14,866/-

       Assessment year : 2005-06
              Unexplained deposits made in bank         ­ Rs.79,472/-
              Foreign tour expenses added u/s 69C     ­ Rs.1,00,000/-.

       Assessment year : 2006-07
              Disallowance of expenses             - Rs.44,216/-
              Disallowance of Professional fee    - Rs.1,14,000/-
              Foreign tour expenses added u/s 69C - Rs.1,50,000/-
                                          3
                                                                  I.T.A. No.211/Mum/2012
                                                                        I.T.A. Nos.1308 to
                                                                           13 10/M um /2012
         Assessment year 2007-08
              Disallowance of expenses              - Rs.95,748/-
              Disallowance of Professional fee       - Rs.48,000/-
              Foreign tour expenses added u/s 69C - Rs.2,00,000/-.


Before us, the Ld A.R admitted that the assessee could not furnish necessary
details to explain the sources for the deposits made into the bank, cash credits
and foreign tour undertaken by the assessee.         He further submitted that the
disallowance of expenses was also made since the assessee could not offer
proper explanations. It is also the submission of the Ld A.R that the assessee
did furnish necessary details before Ld CIT(A), but the first appellate authority
refused to admit them.




6.   Under the above set of facts, in our view, the assessee has not been given
proper opportunity by the tax authorities. Hence, in the interest of natural justice,
we are of the view that all the issues need to be examined afresh. Accordingly,
we set aside the orders passed by Ld CIT(A) in all the years under consideration
and restore all the issues to the file of the AO with the direction to examine all the
issues afresh by duly considering the information and explanations that may be
furnished by the assessee and decide them in accordance with the law. The
assessee is also direct to extend full co-operation to the assessing officer by
furnishing the necessary details that may be called for by the AO.

7.   In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are treated as allowed for
statistical purposes.


     The above order was pronounced in the open court on 12th Sept, 2014.
            12th Sept, 2014    

       Sd                                              sd

(.. / H.L. KARWA)                          (..  ,/ B.R. BASKARAN)
  / PRESIDENT                              /Accountant Member

  Mumbai : 12th
                        Sept,2014.

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS
                               4
                                              I.T.A. No.211/Mum/2012
                                                    I.T.A. Nos.1308 to
                                                       13 10/M um /2012



        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,                   /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.


                                              / BY ORDER,

                 True copy            (Asstt. Registrar)
                                 ,   /ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Reengineering Software Re-engineering Software Reverse Engineering Software Reverse Development Software Change Modulation Software Conversion Software Re-creation Software Re-development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions