Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment
 
 
From the Courts »
  Rites Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-V
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. I.T.C. Limited
  John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)
 Canyon Financial Services Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer
 Chintels India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – Circle 8
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. International Tractors Ltd.
 Hcl Technologies Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2 & Anr.
 New Delhi Television Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)

M/s. SGSIL Geophysical Services Pvt. Ltd., Pvt. Ltd.), CSC, C / 9, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Range 10, New Delhi.
October, 31st 2014
          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
               (DELHI BENCH `G' : NEW DELHI)

     BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
                            and
          SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                         ITA No.2757/Del./2013
                       (Assessment Year : 2007-08)

M/s. SGSIL Geophysical Services Pvt. Ltd., vs.        ACIT, Range 10,
(Formerly known as M/s. Scintrex                      New Delhi.
 Geophysical Services (India) Pvt. Ltd.),
CSC, C / 9, Vasant Kunj,
New Delhi.

       (PAN : AAHCS2860A)

       (Appellant)                                    (Respondent)

          Assessee by : Shri Krishnamohan K. Menon, Advocate
              Revenue by : Shri B.R.R. Kumar, Senior DR

                                  ORDER

PER B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

       This appeal filed by the assessee emanates from the order of the CIT

(Appeals)-X, New Delhi dated 16.01.2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08.



2.     The assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of

different types of geophysical services, such as, geological surveys like

gravimeter, magnetic, resistivity and borehole logging and perforation. During

the year, the assessee has provided borehole logging services for Coal and Coal

Bed Methane and served various customers like Essar Oil Limited, Great

Eastern Engergy Corporation Ltd., Parson Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and Reliance
                                       2                  ITA No.2757/Del/2013





Industries Ltd. The assessee has debited rent for the premises at various project

sites like Jalore in Rajasthan, Shadol in Madhya Pradesh and Asansol in West

Bengal. The Assessing Officer disallowed the payment of rent of Rs.1,42,400/-

on the basis that no rent agreement was produced. The CIT (A) has confirmed

the addition and now the assessee is in appeal before us by taking the following

grounds :-

     "1.      That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,
     the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax *(Appeals)
     [hereinafter referred to as CITA'] is incorrect, illegal, against the
     statutory provisions and liable to be set aside.
     "
     2.       That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,
     the CITA erred in confirming the action of the Ld. Assessing
     Officer [hereinafter referred to as `AO'] in treating the amount of
     Rs.1,42,400/- paid towards rent for business purposes as an
     impermissible claim for deduction on the sole premise that there
     was no rent agreement, even though there were other documents.

     3.      That the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law
     and principles of nature justice.



3.     Grounds No.1 & 3 are general in nature and do not require any

adjudication.



4.     The only substantial ground is Ground No.2 in which the addition of

Rs.1,42,400/- has been challenged.






5.     We have heard both the sides on the issue. Although admittedly there

was no rent agreement, however, the assessee submitted various receipts signed

by the house owners and the amount was petty. The receipts for the rent have
                                         3                   ITA No.2757/Del/2013


been taken by the assessee after affixation of revenue stamp on the receipt.

Due to the nature of the work conducted by the assessee in various small towns

and places and that too for a short period, we find that it will not be practical to

enter into a rent agreement in such places and since the assessee has produced

the receipts for the payment and that too of a very petty amount in comparison

to the total turnover of the assessee, we find that the assessee deserves the relief

and no addition on this count is called for. Therefore, we direct to delete the

addition.

6.      In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed.



     Order pronounced in open court on this 22nd day of October, 2014.

              Sd/-                                     sd/-
        (GEORGE GEORGE K.)                          (B.C. MEENA)
         JUDICIAL MEMBER                        ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated the 22nd day of October, 2014
TS


Copy forwarded to:
     1.Appellant
     2.Respondent
     3.CIT
     4.CIT(A)-X, New Delhi.
     5.CIT(ITAT), New Delhi.                                            AR/ITAT

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Portal Design Website Design Portal Designing Website Designing Web Design Professional Portal Design Professional Website Design Professional Web Design Portal Design India Website Design India Portal Designing India Website Designing India Web Design India Professional Portal Design India Professional Website Design India Chicago Professional Web Design New York Professional Web Design California Website Design Florida Website Design New Jersey Website Design Britain UK Website Design London Manchester Website Design

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions