Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt
 
 
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ACIT 11(I), Room No. 439, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Marg, Mumbai 400 020. Vs. Shri Hrithik Rakesh Nagrath, B-27, Commerce Centre, Ist Floor, Off. New Link Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai 400 053.
October, 08th 2014
                      "H"                          

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "H"                 BENCH,      MUMBAI
      BEFORE SHRI R.C. SHARMA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER &
           SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                   ./I.T.A. No.7239 /Mum/2012
             (     /       Assessment Year : 2009-2010

ACIT ­ 11(I),                        /          Shri Hrithik Rakesh
Room No. 439,                                   Nagrath,
                                     Vs.
Aayakar Bhavan,                                 B-27, Commerce Centre,
M.K. Marg,                                      Ist Floor,
Mumbai ­ 400 020.                               Off. New Link Road,
                                                Andheri (W),
                                                Mumbai ­ 400 053.
                                          . / PAN : AABPN2790F
     ( /Appellant)                  ..   (  / Respondent)

     Appellant by                    Shri Vivek Peram Purna
     Respondent by :                 Shri R. Prasad Rao
          / Date of Hearing                        : 15-09-2014
         /Date of Pronouncement : 15-9-2014
                                      [

                              / O R D E R
PER R.C. SHARMA, A.M.                       :

      This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of ld.
CIT(A) -3, Mumbai dated 25-09-2012 for the A.Y. 2009-10 in the matter of
order passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.    The following grounds have been taken by the Revenue:-

      "1.    On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, whether
      the ld. CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D even
      when the A.O. had made a proximate cause for disallowance of Rs.
      13,58,751/- under section 14A of the I.T. Act.

      2.     On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, whether
      the ld. CIT(A) was justified in relying on his own order of the earlier year
                                      2        ITA 7239/M/12




      thereby ignoring the fact that the A.O. had differentiated the facts of the
      present case from that of the earlier year.

      3.     The appellant prays that the order of CIT (Appeals) on the above ground
      be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer restored."


3.    Rival contentions have been heard and perused the records. Facts in
brief are that the assessee is a film artist by profession.        Assessee was in
receipt of tax free income. During the course of assessment, the A.O. asked
the assessee to explain as to why section 14-A read with Rule 8-D of the
Income Tax Rules, 1962 is not applicable to him, in reply it was submitted
that exempt income comprised of PPF, interest, equity dividend, interest on
R.B.I. Relief Bonds which were either credited through ECS or recovered by
passing a journal entry. As such, there was no expenditure referable to such
exempt income within the meaning of section 14A of the Act and hence no
disallowance is called for. However, the A.O. did not agree with the assessee's
contention and disallowed an amount of Rs. 13,58,751/- by observing that
the assessee has incurred various expenses namely office in-charge, motor
car expenses, computer maintenance, office maintenance etc. The ld. CIT(A)
vide his impugned order,      deleted the addition after having recorded the
following observation:-




            "1.3 I have considered the facts and perused the material on record.
            The provisions of section 14A (1) read with section 14A (2) provides that
            for the purpose of total income computed under this chapter, no
            deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the
            assessee in relation to income which does not form part of total income
            under this Chapter and the AO will determine the amount of
            expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income if he is not satisfied
            with the correctness of the claim of the assessee. The perusal of Profit
            and Loss Account of the appellant shows that the appellant has not
            made any claim of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income,
            therefore, the provisions of section 14 A (1) r.w.s. 14A(2) of the Act are
            not attracted. The AO has also not given any findings on whether the
            assessee has made a claim of expenditure in relation to exempt income
            and the claim is not correct. It is seen that the assessee has earned
            dividend of Rs.10,245/- which has been directly credited to bank
            through ECS. The interest of Rs.69,90l/- received on PPF, for which a
                                      3        ITA 7239/M/12




            journal entry is passed on 31-3-09 and similarly, interest of
            Rs.66,02,652/- on tax free Bonds is credited by journal entries passed
            on 3 1-3-09. Thus, no expenditure has been earned for earning exempt
            income. Therefore, there is no proximate cause for disallowance in
            relationship with exempt income as held in CIT v Walfort Shares &
            Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. 326 ITRJ (SC) and Godrej & Boyce
            Manufacturing Co. Ltd v DCIT (2010) 328 ITR 81 (Bom)for attracting
            the provisions of section 14A. The Honble TAT has confirmed the last
            year's order in ITA No.61 10/Mum/201 1 (AY.2008-09) dated 8.8.2012.
            In view of these facts and following the decision of jurisdictional ITAT in
            assessee's own case, the disallowance of Rs.13,58,751/- is deleted. The
            Ground Nos. 1 to 3 are allowed."


4.    We have considered the rival contentions and found that exempt
income of assessee comprised of interest on tax paid, relief bonds accrued
and PPF interest for which journal entries were passed at the end of the year
and dividend income was credited in the bank through ECS, hence, no
expenditure incurred were referable and relatable to the exempt income. The
ld. CIT(A) further observed that the A.O. has also not given any finding as to
whether the assessee has made a claim of expenditure in relation to exempt
income and the claim is not correct. The categorical finding has been recorded
by the ld. CIT(A) to the effect that the assessee has earned dividend income of
Rs. 10,245/- which has been directly credited to the bank through ECS. The
interest of Rs. 69,901/- received on PPF, for which a journal entry was passed
on 31-3-09 and similarly interest of Rs. 66,02,652/- on tax free bonds               is
credited by journal entries passed on 31-3-09.          Thus, no expenditure has
been incurred for earning exempt income. From the records, we also find that
the expenditure mentioned by the A.O. was in relation to the professional
income earned by the assessee which is taxable under the Income Tax Act,
there is no reason to disallow the expenses incurred for earning he taxable
income. The findings so recorded by the ld. CIT(A) at para 1.3 of his order
has not been controverted by the Department by bringing any positive
material on record. Accordingly, we do not find any reason or infirmity with
the order of the ld. CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 13,58,751/-
                                            4       ITA 7239/M/12







      made by the A.O. u/s 14-A of the Act. Deletion of similar disallowance was
      also confirmed by Tribunal in the immediately preceding A.Y. 2008-09 vide its
      order dated 8-8-2012.

      5.      In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
             Order pronounced in the open court on 15th September, 2014.

                                       15-09-2014    




                   sd/-                                       sd/-
             (SANJAY GARG)                             (R.C. SHARMA)
           JUDICIAL MEMBER                          ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
        Mumbai;              Dated 15-09-2014
                                            [



       . ../ RK , Sr. PS




                /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.    / The Appellant
2.     / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A) ­3,, Mumbai
4.      / CIT ­II, Mumbai
5.             ,     ,  / DR, ITAT, Mumbai H Bench

6.     / Guard file.
                                                                       / BY ORDER,

                            //True Copy//
                                                         /  (Dy./Asstt.    Registrar)
                                                             ,   / ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Company Overview

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions