Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Allahabad HC Orders GSTN to Modify Portal within 1 Month to Allow Appeals Even When Disputed Tax Shows Nil
 Statement Recorded By High Courts Can't Be Later Contradicted By Counsel : Supreme Court
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court

M/s AML Steel Ltd., No.9, 6th Street, Gopalapuram, Chennai - 600 086. vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle I(1), Chennai - 600 034.
October, 14th 2013
            IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                       "B" BENCH, CHENNAI

     BEFORE SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
           AND SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER



                     I.T.A. No. 1538/Mds/2013
                   (Assessment Year : 2006-07)

M/s AML Steel Ltd.,                   The Deputy Commissioner of
No.9, 6th Street, Gopalapuram,        Income Tax,
Chennai - 600 086.               v.   Company Circle I(1),
                                      Chennai - 600 034.
PAN : AAACA 4304 Q
      (Appellant)                         (Respondent)

                 Appellant by    :     None
                Respondent by    :     Shri Guru Bashyam, JCIT

      Date of Hearing            :     01.10.2013
     Date of Pronouncement       :     01.10.2013


                           O R D E R


PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

     When this appeal was called up for hearing, none appeared on

behalf of assessee. Despite issue of notice to the address given in

Form No.36, no authorized person had appeared on behalf of the

assessee.    In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that the

assessee is not interested in prosecuting the case. Following the

decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT v.
                                     2                   I.T.A. No. 1538/Mds/13







Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) (Del), we dismiss this appeal filed

by the assessee, for non-prosecution.


2.      In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.


Order was pronounced in the Court on Tuesday, the 1st of October,

2013, at Chennai.








              sd/-                                     sd/-
        (V.Durga Rao)                             (Abraham P. George)
       Judicial Member                            Accountant Member

Chennai,
Dated the 1st October, 2013.

Kri.

              Copy to:    (1)   Appellant
                          (2)   Respondent
                          (3)   CIT(A)-VI, Chennai
                          (4)   CIT-IV, Chennai
                          (5)   D.R.
                          (6)   Guard file

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting