Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
From the Courts »
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21
 CHAUDHARY SKIN TRADING COMPANY Vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 Deputy Director Of Income Tax Vs. Virage Logic International
 Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 International Taxation Vs. Virage Logic International India
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-06 Vs. Moderate Leasing And Capital Services Pvt. Ltd.
 ITO vs. Vikram A. Pradhan (ITAT Mumbai)

Madhu Finance 212, Tulsiani Chambers,Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 12(3)(4), M. K. Road, Mumbai
October, 17th 2013
                   ""   
    IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "B" BENCH, MUMBAI

        .  ,      ,                                  
     BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VP AND SHRI SANJAY ARORA, AM

                     ./I.T.A. No. 3945/Mum/2012
                    (   / Assessment Year: 2008-09)

Madhu Finance                                      The Income Tax Officer
212, Tulsiani Chambers,                   /        Ward 12(3)(4),
Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021             Vs.      M. K. Road, Mumbai

     . /  . /PAN/GIR No. AAOFM 2688 Q
        ( /Appellant)                        :            (     / Respondent)

          / Appellant by                     :    None

          /Respondent by                     :    Shri Surendra Kumar


                          /                  :    10.10.2013
                    Date of Hearing
                      /
                                             :    10.10.2013
           Date of Pronouncement


                                    / O R D E R
Per Sanjay Arora, A. M.:

      This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner
of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, Mumbai (`CIT(A)' for short) dated 04.04.2012, partly
allowing the assessee's appeal contesting its assessment u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (`the Act' hereinafter) for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2008-09 vide order dated
15.11.2010.
                                             2
                                                         ITA No. 3945/Mum/2012 (A.Y. 2008-09)
                                                                       Madhu Finance vs. ITO




2.    None appeared for and on behalf of the assessee when its appeal was called out for
hearing. The case was posted for 07.10.2013 per a notice through registered post in view
of non appearance on the date of original fixation on 03/7/2013. It was explained to the
bearer of the adjournment application dated 07/10/13 (on record), who could not identify
himself as any responsible person, that the power of attorney being submitted along with
could not be accepted inasmuch as the same has not been accepted by the person in
whose favour it has been made, i.e., Shri Pravin Kumar Bafna of M/s. Jain & Bafna,
Chartered Accountants. The matter was accordingly adjourned to 10/10/2013 to enable
the assessee to rectify this defect or file a proper letter of authority inasmuch as the
Tribunal could move only on the basis of a representation either by the assessee itself or
its authorized representative, i.e., with valid power. However, the assessee has neither
filed any fresh power of attorney or even itself attended the proceedings on the date so
granted.
      Under the circumstances, as it appears to us, the assessee is not serious or earnest
in prosecuting its appeal. As clarified by the hon'ble apex court in CIT v. B.N.
Bhattarcharya [1979] 118 ITR 461 (SC), preferring an appeal does not mean mere filing
of the appeal memo, but effectively pursuing it. We, therefore, following the decisions by
the hon'ble Madhya Pradesh high court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs.
CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480 (MP) and by the hon'ble Bombay high court dated 17.09.2010
in the case of Chemipol vs. Union of India (in Central Excise Appeal No. 62 of 2009), as
well as by the tribunal (Delhi Bench) in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd.,
reported at 38 ITD 320, dismisses the assessee's appeal as un-admitted for want of
prosecution.




3.    In the result, the assessee appeal is dismissed in limine.
                Order pronounced in the open court on October 10, 2013
           Sd/-                                         Sd/-
      (D. MANMOHAN)                                (SANJAY ARORA)
        / VICE PRESIDENT                            / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
 Mumbai;  Dated : 10.10.2013
                             3
                                    ITA No. 3945/Mum/2012 (A.Y. 2008-09)
                                                  Madhu Finance vs. ITO

. ../Roshani, Sr. PS

         /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent
3.     () / The CIT(A)
4.      / CIT - concerned
5.             ,     ,  / DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.     / Guard File
                                   / BY ORDER,



                             /  (Dy./Asstt. Registrar)
                            ,  / ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Bath SEO Company Birmingham SEO Company Bradford SEO Company Brighton and Hove SEO Company Bristol SEO Company Cambridge SEO Company Canterbury SEO Company Carlisle SEO Company Chester SEO Company Chichester SEO Company Coventry SEO Compan

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions