Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS
 
 
From the Courts »
 M/S Abhipra Capital Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Investigation)
 Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases

Madhu Finance 212, Tulsiani Chambers,Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 12(3)(4), M. K. Road, Mumbai
October, 17th 2013
                   ""   
    IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "B" BENCH, MUMBAI

        .  ,      ,                                  
     BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VP AND SHRI SANJAY ARORA, AM

                     ./I.T.A. No. 3945/Mum/2012
                    (   / Assessment Year: 2008-09)

Madhu Finance                                      The Income Tax Officer
212, Tulsiani Chambers,                   /        Ward 12(3)(4),
Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021             Vs.      M. K. Road, Mumbai

     . /  . /PAN/GIR No. AAOFM 2688 Q
        ( /Appellant)                        :            (     / Respondent)

          / Appellant by                     :    None

          /Respondent by                     :    Shri Surendra Kumar


                          /                  :    10.10.2013
                    Date of Hearing
                      /
                                             :    10.10.2013
           Date of Pronouncement


                                    / O R D E R
Per Sanjay Arora, A. M.:

      This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner
of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, Mumbai (`CIT(A)' for short) dated 04.04.2012, partly
allowing the assessee's appeal contesting its assessment u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 (`the Act' hereinafter) for the assessment year (A.Y.) 2008-09 vide order dated
15.11.2010.
                                             2
                                                         ITA No. 3945/Mum/2012 (A.Y. 2008-09)
                                                                       Madhu Finance vs. ITO




2.    None appeared for and on behalf of the assessee when its appeal was called out for
hearing. The case was posted for 07.10.2013 per a notice through registered post in view
of non appearance on the date of original fixation on 03/7/2013. It was explained to the
bearer of the adjournment application dated 07/10/13 (on record), who could not identify
himself as any responsible person, that the power of attorney being submitted along with
could not be accepted inasmuch as the same has not been accepted by the person in
whose favour it has been made, i.e., Shri Pravin Kumar Bafna of M/s. Jain & Bafna,
Chartered Accountants. The matter was accordingly adjourned to 10/10/2013 to enable
the assessee to rectify this defect or file a proper letter of authority inasmuch as the
Tribunal could move only on the basis of a representation either by the assessee itself or
its authorized representative, i.e., with valid power. However, the assessee has neither
filed any fresh power of attorney or even itself attended the proceedings on the date so
granted.
      Under the circumstances, as it appears to us, the assessee is not serious or earnest
in prosecuting its appeal. As clarified by the hon'ble apex court in CIT v. B.N.
Bhattarcharya [1979] 118 ITR 461 (SC), preferring an appeal does not mean mere filing
of the appeal memo, but effectively pursuing it. We, therefore, following the decisions by
the hon'ble Madhya Pradesh high court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs.
CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480 (MP) and by the hon'ble Bombay high court dated 17.09.2010
in the case of Chemipol vs. Union of India (in Central Excise Appeal No. 62 of 2009), as
well as by the tribunal (Delhi Bench) in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd.,
reported at 38 ITD 320, dismisses the assessee's appeal as un-admitted for want of
prosecution.




3.    In the result, the assessee appeal is dismissed in limine.
                Order pronounced in the open court on October 10, 2013
           Sd/-                                         Sd/-
      (D. MANMOHAN)                                (SANJAY ARORA)
        / VICE PRESIDENT                            / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
 Mumbai;  Dated : 10.10.2013
                             3
                                    ITA No. 3945/Mum/2012 (A.Y. 2008-09)
                                                  Madhu Finance vs. ITO

. ../Roshani, Sr. PS

         /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.  / The Respondent
3.     () / The CIT(A)
4.      / CIT - concerned
5.             ,     ,  / DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6.     / Guard File
                                   / BY ORDER,



                             /  (Dy./Asstt. Registrar)
                            ,  / ITAT, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Bath SEO Company Birmingham SEO Company Bradford SEO Company Brighton and Hove SEO Company Bristol SEO Company Cambridge SEO Company Canterbury SEO Company Carlisle SEO Company Chester SEO Company Chichester SEO Company Coventry SEO Compan

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions