Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
« VAT (Value Added Tax) »
 Date for filing quarterly VAT returns extended
 Framing of Central Assessments - Dated 2-2-2017 - VAT - Delhi
 CENVAT Credit (Amendment) Rules, 2017
 VAT to Give Way to Consumption Tax
 Import stage VAT under new VAT law
  VAT returns: Relief for traders as UT allows old form
  Grant of Registration under DVAT and CST
 Taxpayers Face Big Financing Costs From VAT Bill 2017
 VAT returns: Relief for traders as UT allows old form
 Gov’t agrees to retain VAT exemptions of seniors, PWDs Read more: https://business.inquirer.net/223121/govt-agrees-retain-vat-exemptions-seniors-pwds#ixzz4W5NV2I48 Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
 Understanding VAT refunds

Flat owners advised caution over VAT payment to builders
October, 04th 2013

Citizens' groups and consumer forums have appealed to flat owners to refrain from hurriedly paying Valued Added Tax (VAT) to builders, following the Supreme Court's decision.

Citizens' forums like Grahak Hitvardhini, Grahak Panchayat and Sajag Nagrik Manch held a meeting of flat buyers at Perugate Bhave School in Sadashiv Peth on Sunday.

"Some builders may try to interpret the decision to their benefit and pressure flat owners into paying VAT. The owners should not panic and rush to pay the builders," Vivek Velankar, founder of citizens' group Sajag Nagrik Manch, said.

Velankar said the flat owners should make sure the builder has fulfilled all terms and conditions of the agreement. If the builder has not, the citizen should insist to builders that they should fullfill it.

Sudhakar Velankar of Grahak Hitvardhini, the group that has filed the PIL seeking restraint on builders from collecting VAT from buyers, said that more clarity is needed as there are few points that can create confusion while interpreting the Supreme Court verdict.

"The confusing aspects relate to owners of land and developers. We have filed a PIL in Bombay high court and are expecting a hearing on October 23. After that things would be even further clear," he said.

Before making any decisions about paying VAT to the builder, flat owners should review details about the owner of the land, the builder's registration date, and the contract between flat owners and builders, he added.

The owners should also seek details of the works that were completed at the time the contract was signed.

"Flat buyers should demand the calculation of VAT amount based on their personal contract, unless the builders give such calculation, no payment should be made to them," he added.

In August 2012, the state had issued a circular asking developers to pay 5% of the works contract value as VAT for flats under construction between June 20, 2006 and March 31, 2010.

The developers had challenged it in Bombay high court as well as in Supreme Court.

As many as six lakh properties in the state and about 1.5 lakh in Pune were registered between June 20, 2006 and March 31, 2010. Tax liability for every flat could be in the range of Rs 1 lakh to Rs 3 lakh.

Supreme Court verdict

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the validity of the state-imposed Valued Added Tax (VAT) on sale of flats and dismissed a petition filed by developers challenging the state's powers to levy the tax. The SC heard 26 appeals against VAT on sale of flats, 12 of which were from Maharashtra and the rest from Karnataka.

The verdict means that flats sold since July 1, 2006 will be liable for payment of the tax, unless the building was issued an Occupancy Certificate before the sale agreement. Experts said builders can seek to recover the amount from flat buyers only if the sale agreement provides for collection of VAT from the purchaser, not otherwise. Else, builders are liable to pay.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Desktop Application Development Outsourcing Desktop Application Development Offshore Desk

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions