Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

D C I T - 1(1) M/s. Bharat Containers P. Ltd. Room No. 597, Aayakar Bhavan 1st Floor, Cecil Court M.K. Road, Mumbai 400020 Vs. Mahakavi Bhushan Marg Mumbai 400039
October, 16th 2013
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          "B" Bench, Mumbai

                Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
               and Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountant Member

                         ITA No. 8213/Mum/2010
                         (Assessment Year: 2006-07)

D C I T - 1(1)                           M/s. Bharat Containers P. Ltd.
Room No. 597, Aayakar Bhavan         Vs. 1st Floor, Cecil Court
M.K. Road, Mumbai 400020                 Mahakavi Bhushan Marg
                                         Mumbai 400039
PAN - AAACB0484G                         PAN - AAACB0484G
          Appellant                                  Respondent

                   Appellant by:     Dr. Durgesh Sumrott
                   Respondent by:    S/Shri K. Gopal & Satendra Pandey

                   Date of Hearing:       07.10.2013
                   Date of Pronouncement: 07.10.2013

                                 ORDER

Per D. Manmohan, V.P.

      This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 19.07.2010
passed by the CIT(A)-1, Mumbai and it pertains to A.Y. 2006-07.

2.    Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: -

     "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in
         law, in directing to allow claim of expenses against income from
         other sources disallowed by the AO."






     2.   The CIT(A) has further overlooked the fact that the assessee has
          not established the nexus of expenses with reference to the
          income earned from other sources."

3.    The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the tax effect in
the instant case works out to `2,10,289/-. As per CBDT circular No. 3 dated
09.02.2011 an appeal should not be preferred by Revenue unless the tax
effect is above `3,00,000/- or the issue arising out of the order of the first
Appellate Authority is exceptional in nature and it is specifically mentioned
in the authorisation. In the absence of showing that the case falls under
                                         2                   ITA No. 8213/Mum/2010
                                                        M/s. Bharat Containers P. Ltd.

exceptional circumstance the appeal filed by Revenue deserves to be
dismissed as unadmitted.

4.        On the other hand, the learned D.R. submitted that the appeal is duly
authorised by the Commissioner of Income Tax and hence the AO was
justified in filing the appeal.

5.        We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the
record. In the light of the circular issued by the CBDT (supra), which is
binding upon the Revenue authorities, this appeal deserves to be dismissed
as unadmitted for want of tax effect and we order accordingly.






Order pronounced in the open court on 7th October, 2013.

                    Sd/-                                   Sd/-
               (Sanjay Arora)                         (D. Manmohan)
            Accountant Member                         Vice President

Mumbai, Dated: 7th October, 2013

Copy to:

     1.   The   Appellant
     2.   The   Respondent
     3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 1, Mumbai
     4.   The   CIT­ 1, Mumbai City
     5.   The   DR, "B" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                                        By Order

//True Copy//
                                                     Assistant Registrar
                                             ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
n.p.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting