Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
« From the Courts »
 Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax 10(3), Room No.451, 4th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai - 400020 Vs. M/s. Ganesh Polychem Ltd., 71, Udyog Kshetra, 2nd Floor, Mulund Goregoan, Link Road, Mulund (W), Mumbai – 400 080
 M/s Neeta Textiles, 685, Govind Chowk, M.J. Market, Mumbai – 400 002 Vs. The Income Tax Officer – WD- 14(3)(2), Mumbai.
 Shri Deepen A. Parekh, 601 Auto Commerce House, Nana Chowk, Kennedy Bridge, Mumbai – 400 007. Vs. D.C.I.T. Central Cir. 20, Mumbai.
 ITO Ward 11(3) New Delhi Vs. FX Enterprises Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. E-27/8, Ground Floor, Right Side Malviya Nagar, New Delhi
 Sun Life India Service Centre Pvt. Ltd., Unitech World Tower-B, 2nd floor, Sector-39, Gurgaon. Vs. ACIT, Circle-II, Gurgaon.
 Jakson Enterprises 626, 6th Floor, Tower-A, DLF Tower, Jasola, New Delhi-110076 Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-25, New Delhi.
 Asstt. Commissioner of Income tax- 21(1), C-10, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-51 Vs. M/s The Hatesh CHS Ltd., Plot No.51, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai-400049
 Shri Rashad Ahmed Mujawar 9/B, 302,God Gift Tower M.R. Chowk, Bandra (W) Mumbai 400050 Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-24&26 4th Floor, Ŕayakar Bhavan Mumbai 400020
 Indu Kapahi, W-40, Greater Kailash I, New Delhi-110 048 Vs. ITO, Ward 43(1), DAO-67 New Delhi
 Shri Kayyum Ahamed, Porp. VIP Publicity, 422/13, Shastri Nagar, Vs. ITO, Wad 1(3), Meerut
 Mitsubishi Corporation India, Private Limited, Birla Tower, 5th Floor, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi – 110 001. Vs. DCIT, Circle 16 (2), New Delhi.

CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals (Supreme Court)
October, 04th 2013

S. 244A: The department is not obliged to pay interest on interest as that is not provided in the law. Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) awarded compensation for inordinate delay on its facts

In Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) the Supreme Court held that if the department delays paying interest on the refunded amount, the assessee is entitled to interest on interest. Subsequently, in CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals, a view was expressed that Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) did not lay down the correct law and ought to be reconsidered. The matter was referred to a larger Bench. HELD by the larger Bench:

The judgment in Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) has been misquoted and misinterpreted by the assessees and also by the Revenue. Their view that in Sandvik case this Court had directed the Revenue to pay interest on the statutory interest in case of delay in the payment and that the Revenue is obliged to pay an interest on interest in the event of its failure to refund the interest payable within the statutory period is not correct. In Sandvik Asia, the Court was considering the issue whether an assessee who is made to wait for refund of interest for decades be compensated for the great prejudice caused to it due to the delay in its payment after the lapse of statutory period. In the facts of that case, this Court came to the conclusion that there was an inordinate delay on the part of the Revenue in refunding certain amount which included the statutory interest and therefore, directed the Revenue to pay compensation for the same but not an interest on interest. S. 244A provides for interest on refunds under various contingencies. It is clarified that it is only that interest provided for under the statute which may be claimed by an assessee from the Revenue and no other interest on such statutory interest.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2015 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions