Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 ITO 8(2)(1) R. No. 216, Aayakar Bhavan MK Marg Mumbai Vs. Rishi R. Oswal 81-82, Solitaire, Central Avenue, M.K. Marg Mumbai 400 020
 Income Tax Officer- Range 11(2)(3), Room No. 479, 4th floor, Aayakar Bhavan,MK Road, Mumbai 400 020. Vs. Dr. Firuza Rajesh Parikh, 121-122, 12th Floor, Jolly Maker No. 3,119, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai -400 005.
 ITO, Coy, Ward-12(2), Room No. 337, C.R. Building New Delhi Vs. Gopi Pvt. Ltd. 18, Rajasthan Udyog Nagar GTK Road New Delhi
 HB Estate Developers ltd, H-72, Connaught Circus, New Delhi Vs. DCIT, Circle-12(1), New Delhi
 ACIT, Circle-12(1), New Delhi Vs. Gillette Diversified Operations Pvt . Ltd. 34, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi
 ITA-8(1)(3) R.No. 206, 2nd Floor Aayakar Bhavan M.K. Road Mumbai 400 020 Vs. Dipti Nikhil Modi Unit No. 5, Shah Indl. Estate, Veera Desai Road, Andheri (W) Mumbai 400 058
 ITO 8(2)(1) R. No. 216, Aayakar Bhavan MK Marg Mumbai Vs. Rishi R. Oswal 81-82, Solitaire, Central Avenue, M.K. Marg Mumbai 400 020
 ITO 25(2)(4) C-11 1st Floor, Pratyakshkar Bhavan Bandra (E) Mumbai 400 051 Vs. M/s. Raviraj Construction Co. A/101, Radharaman Aprt, Kandarpada, Dahisar (W), Mumbai 400 068
 Delhi Call Centre Private Limited, I-10, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(1), IP Estate, CR Building, New Delhi - 110002
 ACIT, Circle 12(1) New Delhi Vs. Hindustan Commerce Pvt. Ltd. 40-41, Community Centre, New Friends Colony, New Delhi
 Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(4), New Delhi Vs. M/s Metallica Industries Ltd., 72, Janpath, New Delhi-110001

CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals (Supreme Court)
October, 04th 2013

S. 244A: The department is not obliged to pay interest on interest as that is not provided in the law. Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) awarded compensation for inordinate delay on its facts

In Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) the Supreme Court held that if the department delays paying interest on the refunded amount, the assessee is entitled to interest on interest. Subsequently, in CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals, a view was expressed that Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) did not lay down the correct law and ought to be reconsidered. The matter was referred to a larger Bench. HELD by the larger Bench:

The judgment in Sandvik Asia 280 ITR 643 (SC) has been misquoted and misinterpreted by the assessees and also by the Revenue. Their view that in Sandvik case this Court had directed the Revenue to pay interest on the statutory interest in case of delay in the payment and that the Revenue is obliged to pay an interest on interest in the event of its failure to refund the interest payable within the statutory period is not correct. In Sandvik Asia, the Court was considering the issue whether an assessee who is made to wait for refund of interest for decades be compensated for the great prejudice caused to it due to the delay in its payment after the lapse of statutory period. In the facts of that case, this Court came to the conclusion that there was an inordinate delay on the part of the Revenue in refunding certain amount which included the statutory interest and therefore, directed the Revenue to pay compensation for the same but not an interest on interest. S. 244A provides for interest on refunds under various contingencies. It is clarified that it is only that interest provided for under the statute which may be claimed by an assessee from the Revenue and no other interest on such statutory interest.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2015 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions