Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt :: TDS :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit
 
 
VAT (Value Added Tax) »
 Amendments in the second Schedule received from Finance Deptt.
 VAT exemption stays in tax reform bill
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bangalore Banches Bangalore 'A' Bench DB Case Causelist for The Week from 22-05-2017 To 25-05-2017
 Amendments in Second schedule appended to Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004
 Haryana govt exempts solar devices from VAT net
 Court rules out VAT on Paradise equity transfer
 VAT gone but riddle of derivatives traded on commodity exchanges lives on
 Rule 2(L) Of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Amended
 Haryana govt exempts solar equipment from VAT
 AP to push for same benefits under GST for VAT exempted goods
 Andhra Pradesh to push for same benefits under GST for VAT exempted goods

Builder-buyer tussle on VAT intensifies
October, 07th 2013

With the Supreme Court upholding the Bombay High Court verdict asking builders in Maharashtra to pay six per cent Value Added Tax (VAT) on the sale of under construction flats between the years 2006 and 2010, the tussle regarding who is responsible for the payment is getting intense.

While builders are claiming that they will pass this on to buyers and have also sent them notices, many are saying that there needs to be more clarity on who is responsible and what if the builder has already charged them. According to industry experts, buyers had been asked to pay the additional money to builders at the time of property purchase, either by way of bank guarantees or keeping aside extra funds in an escrow account.

Extra funds provided as bank guarantees have been encashed by the builders already, leaving buyers with no options. Though these buyers can sue the builder for the same, property lawyer Vinod Sampat says, they need to decide if they want to spend another six per cent of the flat cost to fight a case or not.

What should the others do? Should they simply pay up? Sunil Mantri, vice-president of National Real Estate Developers Council says, “The law does not say that a builder cannot recover VAT from the home buyers. Hence, this tax will be passed to the home buyers.” But Sampat advises against paying up. “If you have already got possession of the house, you don't need to worry.” He warns that though the VAT is being charged only on under construction properties, many developers are passing on VAT cost to even those buyers who had bought ready properties. “Such buyers don't have to pay VAT,” he adds.

Agrees lawyer Sandhya Sondhi. “I would advise such home buyers to wait and not pay up immediately. There are issues with calculation of VAT. It is suppose to be calculated only on the construction cost. But, many builders are calculating it on construction plus land purchase cost.” She advises buyers to say that since they do not know the construction cost, they can't pay VAT. The reason being that many builders are charging extra to buyers but paying the government only what is required of them. Thus, they are making money at the cost of the buyer.

Only those who still have not got possession of the flat are the ones who have guns to their heads. To be able to pass-on the VAT cost to buyers, builders had put a clause to the home purchase agreement saying that the buyer will have to bear any incremental cost including taxes. Bheru Choudhary, Partner, IC Legal Advocates & Solicitors says, if it is mentioned in the agreement, then the individual will have to pay. If not, the developer can file a case against the home buyer for recovery of the money. Or, he can terminate the agreement.”

Sondhi says that terminating a home purchase agreement is not easy. “A builder cannot cancel an agreement. This will mean additional cost to the builder for registration and stamp duty for the property in his name. No builder will ever do that.” The developer may try to bring the property under litigations. This will dispute the title of the property. This can pose a problem at the time of selling the property.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Integrated Software Solutions Integrated Software Development Integrated Software Services Integrated Software Solutions India Integrated Softw

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions