Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
From the Courts »
  H.T. MEDIA LIMITED Vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV, NEW DELHI
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu), New Delhi Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. Index Securities Private Limited
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Benches, Ahmedabad Constitution For The Period From 18/09/2017 To 22/09/2017
  M/s Brothers & Sisters Enterprise vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
  Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. DLF Universal Ltd.
 Jcb India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &
 Saheb Ram Om Prakash Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & ORS
 Tulsi Tracom Private Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 9
 M/s Brothers & Sisters Enterprise vs. JCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Shri Vinod Kumar Arora,75-A, Kamla Nagar,Hisar., Vs. ITO, Ward 4,Hisar.
October, 04th 2012
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     (DELHI BENCH `H' : NEW DELHI)
              BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
               SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                                     ITA No.4195/Del./2011
                                 (Assessment Year : 2006-07)

Shri Vinod Kumar Arora,                       Vs.             ITO, Ward 4,
75-A, Kamla Nagar,                                            Hisar.
Hisar.
(PAN/GIR No.AGFPA4931R)

(Appellant)                                                   (Respondent)

                             Assessee by : None
                        Revenue by : Ms. Shumana Sen, Sr.DR





                                       ORDER


PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M.


       This appeal of the assessee emanates from the order of the CIT (A), Rohtak, dated
12.07.2011, relevant to assessment year 2006-07.


2.     A defect notice      ticking at Serial No.7 asking for "form No.35/Grounds of
Appeal/Statement of the facts before the CIT(A)/DY.CIT, not filed in duplicate" was
served on the assessee to make available the same within ten days from the date of the
receipt, but the assessee did not respond. On 01.10.2012, none appeared on behalf of the
assessee nor any application for adjournment has been received at the time of hearing of
the appeal. Earlier on 23.05.2012 also, assessee was not present at the time of hearing of
the appeal as well. Thus, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of
the present appeal.
3.     Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules, 1963 and following various decisions
of the Tribunal including in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd., reported in 38
ITD 320 (Del.) and the judgment of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of
                                             2                   I.T.A. No.4195/Del./2011



                                                                          (A.Y. : 2006-07)
Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), we treat the appeal of the
assessee as unadmitted and dismiss the same.
4.     As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.


       Order pronounced in open court soon after the conclusion of the hearing on
01.10.2012.



           Sd/-                                                      Sd/-
      (SHAMIM YAHYA)                                              (U.B.S. BEDI)
 ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                              JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated : Oct. 01, 2012
SKB
Copy of the order forwarded to:-
   1. Appellant
   2. Respondent
   3. CIT
   4. CIT(A), Rohtak.
   5. CIT(ITAT)                                              Deputy Registrar, ITAT
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions