Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: TDS :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment
 
 
« Indirect Tax »
 The threat of harsh penalty should not impede tax compliance
 What are the tax exemption limits for allowances, reimbursements paid to employees? Find out
 High-income taxpayers to get priority treatment and extra facilities
 GST input tax credit rules: How taxpayers will benefit from ITC
 More complications in filing income tax returns
 Guidelines for selection of cases for scrutiny during the financial-year 2017-2018
 CBDT asks Income Tax officials to pull their socks up as revenue collection not satisfactory
 Nearly 15 pct growth in direct tax collections for fiscal 2017-18
 Transformation of indirect taxation landscape
 Plenty of hiccups' expected as India rolls out new tax reform
 Income-tax (16th Amendment) Rules, 2017

Retrospective taxation: Headed for a climax in the days ahead
October, 15th 2012

The job is far from over. The UPA Government will have to get Parliamentary nod if it were to decide to bring indirect transfer of shares to tax on a prospective basis.

This is because Budget 2012-13 had inserted several explanations (with retrospective application) in various sections of the income tax law.

These explanations need to be revisited if the Government accepts the Shome Panel recommendation to bring indirect transfers to tax prospectively, say tax experts.

For repairing the income tax law, such explanations need to be either modified or done away with, they said.

Besides insertion of explanations, the source based enabling provision to tax income of non-residents Section 9 was amended to bring indirect transfers like the Vodafone-Hutch deal into the tax net.

The legislative changes were described by the Finance Ministry as clarificatory.

The explanations were inserted to clear the air that it was always the legislatures intent to bring indirect transfers to tax, Finance Ministry officials had earlier said, defending the move to introduce the explanations in Finance Bill 2012.

The clarificatory amendments had to be done from the day the Income-Tax Act came into force and hence carried the moniker retrospective amendments.

This amendment helped overrule the Supreme Court judgment which ruled in favour of Vodafone after interpreting Section 9.

In light of Shome Committee recommendations that amendments are not genuinely clarificatory in nature, it now needs to be seen whether Government will reconsider retrospective application of such amendments.

If the Government were to go ahead with the Shome committee recommendations, then necessary amendments would be required considering amendments which are not clarificatory in nature generally has prospective application, said Aseem Chawla, Partner, MPC Legal.

Therefore earlier amendments made in law including insertion of explanation having retrospective effect would require to be revisited, he said.

However, it will be interesting to note which way the Government will move given that the Attorney General has already opined on the appropriateness of retrospective amendments.

So do explanations have the same force of law as the main provision?

Explanations do not have the same force of law as the main provision. They are secondary to the main provision. But explanations are certainly part of law, said Sunil Jain, Partner and Head of Direct Tax Practice at J Sagar Associates.

Jain felt that the Government cannot adopt the route of issuing a circular for bringing indirect transfers to taxation on a prospective basis.

Chawla said that explanation is a part of the main section and that it cannot be read in isolation.

The intention of adding the Explanation is that if anything is not clear in the main section, then it shall be made clear by adding the Explanation, he said.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Internet Marketing Website Marketing Internet Promotion Internet Marketing India Website Marketing India Internet Promotion India Internet Marketing Consultancy Website Marketing Consulta

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions