Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: empanelment :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
« Service Tax »
 The way ahead for goods and services tax
 Goods & Service Tax (GST): Recent Clarifications
 Tax payers can see status of returns filed on GSTN portal
 Export And Import Of Goods Under GST
 The Finance Resolution And Deposit Insurance Bill, 2017
 Payment made in revenue sharing deal exempt from service tax
 India seen posting stronger growth as businesses adjust to new tax
 GST High Powered Committee On Return Filing - Representation by GST Research Foundation
  Changes In Central Goods And Services Tax Rules, 2017
 GST return filing to be a breeze for small businesses
 Changes In Central Goods And Services Tax Rules, 2017

Multitudinous circulars on prosecution need consolidation
October, 10th 2011

Imagine the predicament of an officer when he gets in his hand the latest circular on prosecution dated 12th May 2011 for service tax cases. It says that all previous instructions and guidelines in Central Excise are also applicable mutatis mutandis. Now when I look for the Central Excise Circulars I find that there are far too many and the same point has been discussed in different circulars in different ways . That is hardly any finality on some crucial points. Moreover, Custom circulars have not been referred to. This is a wrong approach because both Customs, Excise and Service Tax should have the same principles regarding prosecution. This circular should have ideally, incorporated the general principles enunciated in the Customs and Excise circulars into this circular. That would have made the circular self contained and not an open ended one. This circular is in a letter form with F. No.354/45/2011-TRU issued from Tax Research Unit, whereas all circulars on prosecution have been issued from the administrative sections.

Multitudinous circulars,guidelines, letters and manual instructions on Customs, Excise, Service tax on prosecution, have invariably led to inconsistencies and vagueness as discussed below.

The crucial point is about filing prosecution before or after adjudication. The Service Tax circular dated 12th May 2011 says that prosecution should be initiated after departmental adjudication though there is no legal bar against prosecution before adjudication. However, the circular No.15/90-CX-6 dated 9.8.1990 lays down at para 6 that the decision on prosecution should be taken on completion of adjudication proceedings. The Supreme Court in the case of Radheshyam Kejriwal vs. State of West Bengal-2011(266)ELT294(SC), has very clearly observed that while adjudication and criminal proceedings can legally be launched together since they are independent proceedings, if in adjudication, the decision is that the allegation against the accused is unsustainable on merits, criminal prosecution on same sets of facts and circumstances cannot be allowed to continue. So it is necessary for the CBEC to clearly indicate under what circumstances prosecution can be launched even before adjudication. I can say where. Where smuggled goods have been found with carriers whereas the goods belong to somebody else who is not traceable, and the carriers can easily run away if they get a bail, prosecution should be launched immediately. In 'Preventive' Department cases where they deal with clandestinely smuggled goods, prosecution should be launched earlier than adjudication which takes long time. In appraising cases adjudication must be done first. This deserves to be clearly stated. In the absence of that there has been misuse in the past and there is no guarantee that it will not be repeated.

There are contradictory instructions regarding who will decide about prosecution. In the circular dated 12th May 2011 it is said that the adjudicator should write whether it is a fit case for prosecution though it is not necessary to do so.

Such vagueness should be avoided. There are circulars which empower the Chief Commissioner to decide it. So a clarification is necessary to say that the adjudicator need not write about prosecution since there is a separate procedure laid down.

My conclusion and suggestions are the following.

(a) Since prosecution is a very general subject, a consolidated circular on all these points in different circulars should be issued applicable to all three taxes. This should cover all the common issues namely, (i) not filing prosecution for offenses of technical nature, (ii) prosecuting directors of companies, (iii) prosecuting nominee directors (iv) whether to arrest before prosecution, (v) who will decide about the prosecution, (vi) withdrawal of prosecution, (vii) how to follow up prosecution, (viii) compounding of prosecution and (ix) where prosecution should be filed before or after adjudication.

(b) Where the issues are different such as the threshold above which prosecution can be launched, they should be indicated separately in the same circular.

(c) Circular should be issued with a certain amount of precision (avoiding verbosity) and from the proper section with a circular number and not in a letter form.

(d) The Supreme Court has accorded a very high degree of importance to the circulars of the Board and called them binding. So matching amount of importance should be accorded to drafting the circular.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
E-catalogue online catalogue E-brochure online brochure online product catalogue online product catalogue e-catalogue Indi

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions