Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: TDS
 
 
« ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata Benches Kolkata Constitution of Kolkata Benches for 05/12/2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches ahmedabad S/shri R. P. Tolani, Jm & Manish Borad, Am Causelist For Bench 'A' Date : 05/12/2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi Benches New Delhi The Revised Constitution of Delhi Benches from 28/11/2016 To 01/12/2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches Mumbai Statement showing The List of Special Bench Cases Pending for 2016 as on 16/11/2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches Mumbai list of order ready for pronouncement on 30/11/2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches Chennaj Revised Constitution For The Week From O5/1212016 To O8/12120-16
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: Vice President’s Secretariat: Hyderabad Constitution Of Hyderabad Benches
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench List Of Division Bench Cases Posted Before Shri V.Durga Rao, Hon'ble Judicial Member & Shri G.Manjunatha, Hon'ble Accountant Member During The Period From 21.11.2016 To 09.12.2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai. List Of Division Bench Cases Posted For Hearing From 25.11.2016
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. List Of Division Bench Cases Posted For Hearing From 28.11.2016 To 01.12.2016 Before ‘a’ Bench
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench List Of Division Bench Cases Posted Before Shri V.Durga Rao, Hon'ble Judicial Member & Shri G.Manjunatha, Hon'ble Accountant Member During The Period From 21.11.2016 To 09.12.2016

Interest deductible despite 'thin capitalisation'
October, 03rd 2011

 This write-up is based on a recent ruling of ITAT, Mumbai in case of Besix Kier Dabhol, SA vs. DDIT [131 ITD 299].

A Belgian Company opened a project office in India for the purpose of construction of Fuel Jetty. The Belgian Company did not have any other business activity except the Indian project office. The Indian project office was indisputably regarded a Permanent Establishment (PE) of the Belgian Company in India.
 
The total Paid-up Capital of the Belgian Company was only Rs 38 lakhs contributed by two shareholders. The PE of the Belgian Company, however, borrowed Rs 94 crores directly from the shareholders of the Belgian Company; in this manner the PE had a borrowing of Rs 94 crores as against a Share Capital of only Rs 38 lakhs. The PE claimed deduction of expenses on account of interest on the said borrowings against its income in India.

The Department was of the view that the payments made by the Indian PE did not constitute admissible deduction as these payments were from self to self. However, Honble Tribunal held that in the instant case interest was not paid by the Indian PE to its head office; the interest was paid to the shareholders of the parent company. It would amount as interest paid to independent outside parties.

The ITAT also observed that since the only business carried out by the assessee is the project in India, its entire profits are taxable in India and all its expenses, which are incurred to earn Indian income, are deductible in ascertainment of its taxable income.

Referring to Indo-Belgium Tax Treaty, the Honble Tribunal observed that although the treaty provides that notional intra-organization deductions are not to be allowed unless these are backed by a corresponding third party outgo, this limitation does not affect the present case because it is beyond dispute that the entire borrowings are for the purposes of the business of the PE.

Besides the above argument, the Revenue took a strong objection to allowability of interest on the ground of thin capitalization rule. It was argued that the borrowings of the assessee, on which interest has been claimed as deduction, are infact part of the capital of the assessee which is brought in the garb of borrowings purely on tax considerations. Company is so thinly capitalized that its entire debt capital should infact be re-characterized as equity capital.

Thin capitalization refers to a situation in which capital of a business is made up of a greater portion of debt than equity. This method is used as a tool in international tax planning. It is often more advantageous in international context to arrange financing of a company by loan rather than by equity. This treatment will certainly affect the legitimate tax revenue of the country in which business is carried out because interest is tax deductible and that results in lower taxes in respect of the profits of the PE of the assessee.

The Honble Tribunal after indepth analysis of the facts and law held that thin capitalization rules have not yet been introduced in India, although Direct-tax Code Bill, 2010 does contain a gist of such rules as a part of General Anti-avoidance Rule. Until and unless the rules are introduced in India, it is not open to tax authorities to re-characterize the debt capital as equity capital and make interest payment as non-deductible.

The Honble Tribunal while allowing the claim for deduction of interest paid to shareholders of the parent company did appreciate the stand taken by the Revenue but with the following curious remarks:

The Assessing Officer was clearly ahead on his times in disallowing the expenses based on his notions of thin capitalization rules, when such rules had not even reached the drawing board stage in India.

The foreign companies are however advised to keep the proposed thin capitalization rule in mind while doing business in India.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions