sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
ę Auditing »
 Supreme Court puts the spotlight on audit firms
 Auditing to be less of a burden as accountants embrace AI
 CAG's report on GST will be totally paperless
 Time Limit For Completion Of Assessment From The Date Of Special Auditorís Report Under Income Tax Act, 1961
 Provisioning pertaining to Fraud Accounts
 Tax Audit Report (TAR) Certain exceptions and increased limits according to number of partners and considering nature of activity are desirable
 Cost Auditing Standards [ Cost Audit Documentation (102)] Ė Part-II
 Conference on Companies Act gets under way
 New bureau to dissolve state-run banks' power to choose auditors
 Foreign Exchange Management (Permissible Capital Account Transactions) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2015
 ICAI forms 'prima facie' view on NSEL auditor

RCOM Decries DoTs Special Audit; No Revenue Inflation
October, 28th 2009

Reliance Communications came under the scanner of the Indian Department of Telecommunication (DoT) in January this year for alleged manipulation of its accounts and evasion of its licence fees to the tune of Rs. 3.16 billion. The DoT appointed a special audit taskforce to review its financials for the fiscals 2006-07 and 2007-08, and check compliance with licence fee payments. There were also complaints by analysts that the companys reporting of annual gross revenue numbers were different at the stock exchanges and to the Indian Telecom Regulatory body TRAI. The auditing firm - the Jaipur-based Parekh &  Co - recently completed its report which RCOM has decried vehemently.

In a statement to the BSE, the company calls the report incorrect, hopelessly biased, one-sided and prejudiced; it also accuses the auditing committee of  a conspiracy with corporate rivals to malign RCOM s image and reputation. On the backdrop of executives of the Indian telecom ministry facing corruption charges over the 2G spectrum distribution process, this paints quite a poor picture of the Indian telecom scene.

Licence Fee Evasion: Rs. 3.16B

According to RCOM, of the Rs. 3.16 billion licence fee the company evaded, over half of it - Rs. 1.6 billion, is false as the Telecom Dispute Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and the Custom Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) have already settled cases related to these in RCOMs favour, such as the Rs. 90 crore towards licence fees on discounts allowed, and Rs. 70 crore towards licence fees on income such as unrealised foreign exchange, and interests and dividends earned by the company before it became a licensee. In any case, RCOM says these are industry issues and impact all telecom operators, some in even larger quantum.

What about the rest - Rs. 1.56 billion? The telco only notes that it anticipates no additional financial liability towards spectrum or licence fee.RCOM has confidently stated that its accounts are in order and were verified by the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in May 2009.

Inflating Revenues: Rs. 29.15B

The audit report, the company points out, has not recorded anywhere any findings on the alleged inflation of revenue to the tune of Rs. 29.15 billion that various media had reported on, on October 12, 2009. According to DNA, the audit report alleges that RCOM had inflated its wireless revenues by 23% to Rs 15,213 crore in the 2007-08 fiscal to shareholders, and then under-reported its revenues to TRAI, thereby evading licence fees and spectrum charges worth Rs 224.79 crore.

RCOM opines that the media reports were baseless, unsupported and contrary to the facts and that its accounts are in full conformity with companies Act 1956.

Differing Financials

Observations by Parakh & Co on the differences between the revenues reported in the companys financial statements and those reported to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) refer to reconciliations prepared and filed by the company itself with DoT and TRAI, the telco claims.

The two government bodies are also auditing four other leading telcos: Tata Teleservices, Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Essar and Idea Cellular. When TRAI had ordered new telcos, who reported sudden and massive growths, to reveal their financial structure, it was able to cover the loophole that allowed companies to sell stakes for high margins. An amendment clause now requires a three year lock in period before the company can sell more than a 10% stake, thus preventing profiteering to a large extent. With more such audits and exercises to increase transparency,  ambiguities that plague the ecosystem can be fixed.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System development CMS development Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions Content Management Services CMS Services CMS Software

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions