Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Auditing »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 NFRA issues Draft Procedure for Submission of Audit Files
 Auditors barred from putting a value on companies they are auditing
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 18, Related Parties
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 17, Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Internal Audit
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 16, Using the Work of an Expert
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 14, Internal Audit in an Information Technology Environment
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 13, Enterprise Risk Management
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 12, Internal Control Evaluation
 Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 11, Consideration of Fraud in an Internal Audit
  Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 9, Communication with Management
  Standard on Internal Audit (SIA) 8, Terms of Internal Audit Engagement

Audit questions reserve price logic
October, 21st 2009

Casting a shadow on the allotment of land in Rajiv Gandhi Chandigarh Technology Park (RGCTP) at reduced rates, the special audit conducted by ministry of home affairs has observed that the basis of fixing reserve price at different rates on the same campus could not be ascertained from the available records.

It states, It is not understandable as to how and why valuation was done on the lower side. No input, recommendation or examination was asked for by a different related department of the administration. The report further says that it is not clear to the audit on what ground the rates were reduced when there was an increasing trend of market rates of land on freehold basis in major cities of the country. Due to this, a loss of over Rs 2.8 crore was suffered by the administration.

The audit has also raised objections on the allotment of hotel site in the IT park to Kujjal Builders. The report says that it was noted that the business hotel site land measuring 3.94 acres without permissible ground coverage of 40% was to be auctioned on December 3, 2005. The auction could not be conducted due to non-competitive rates as only one bidder turned up.

For the next date, the original terms and conditions were modified by increasing the floor area ratio of the hotel site from 1.25 to 1.50 and deleting the eligibility condition of allowing only three companies or consortia. Five agencies eventually took part in the open auction held on March 9, 2006 and the highest bid by DLF/Kujjal was accepted by the board of members.

However, it is not clear that when earnest money amounting to Rs 25,00,000 had been deposited by DLF Universal Ltd, then how the land was allotted to Kujjal Builders. In view of audit, the allotment of land to Kujjal Builders without it having deposited the earnest money, as was required by the bidding document, was irregular and needs investigation, reads the audit report.

Further, the non-recovery of interest in respect of conditions of allotment letter shows that the agency had been favoured by putting the government to loss. The short recovery may be calculated and got recovered, it suggests.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting