Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
From the Courts »
 BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-2
 Paradigm Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi
 M/s Televista Electronics Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Vs. Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd
  SRD Nutrients Private Limited vs. CCE (Supreme Court)
 Samvardhana Motherson International Ltd. (Formerly Known As(M/s Samvardhana Motherson Finance Ltd.)a Vs. Assitant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 22(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)-2 Vs. M/s Frontline Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
 Ram Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-8 Vs. St Microelectronics Private Ltd.
  The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 M/s Ess Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi

Validity of Return-Return signed by General Manager of Company
October, 06th 2007

CIT vs Bhiwani Synthetics Ltd.
Citation 199 Taxation 204 
 
Validity of Return - Return signed by General Manager of Company

The return of the assessee company was signed by the General Manager (Finance). The CIT(A) and the Tribunal directed the A.O. to give an opportunity to the assessee to cure the defect. The company had given a power of attorney to the said General Manager to sign the return. The company had not disowned the return. The order of the Tribunal was not prejudicated to Revenue. No question of law arose.

High Court of Delhi

CIT vs Bhiwani Synthetics Ltd.

ITA No. 228 of 2006

Madan B. Lokur and Vipin Sanghi, JJ

4 September 2006

P.L. Bansal with Vishnu Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant
None for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

The Revenue is aggrieved by an order dated 13th June, 2005 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D' in ITA No. 1765/2001 relevant for the assessment year 1994-95.

The Assessee filed its return of income on 30th November, 1994 declaring a loss. It appears that the return was not signed by the Managing Director or the Director of the Assessee, which is a company. The return was signed by the General Manager (Finance) and the Company Secretary of the Assessee.

The Assessing Officer, in view of Section 140 (c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 came to the conclusion that since the return was not filed by the Managing Director or the Director, it was non est.

It may be noted that at no point of time there was any contest on behalf of the Assessee that this return was not its return or was not an authorised return or that the General Manager (Finance) and the Company Secretary did not have any authority to file the return. On the contrary, there was a power of attorney given by the company in favour of the General Manager (Finance) to sign the return.

Feeling aggrieved by the view taken by the Assessing Officer, the Assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) who was of the opinion that the defect was a curable defect and an opportunity ought to have been given to the Assessee to rectify it. He, accordingly, directed the Assessing Officer to give such an opportunity to the Assessee. He also noted the contention of the Assessee that the Assessing Officer ought to have given an opportunity to cure the defect under Section 139(8) of the Act.

Against the order passed by the CIT (A), the Revenue preferred an appeal before the Tribunal in which it was contended that the appeal filed by the Assessee before the CIT (A) was not maintainable and that the defect was not a curable defect.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. In other words, the direction given by the CIT (A) to the Assessing Officer to give an opportunity to the Assessee to have the return signed by the Managing Director or the Director of the Assessee stood affirmed. Learned counsel for the Revenue has raised the same contentions before us as were raised before the "Tribunal.

We are of the view that on the facts of this case, since there is nothing on record to suggest that the Assessee has disowned the return that was signed by the General Manager (Finance) of the Assessee and on the contrary, a power of attorney was being given by the Assessee to its General Manager (Finance) for signing the return, it would have been appropriate if ah opportunity had been granted to the Assessee to have the return signed by the Managing Director or its Director in accordance with the directions given by the CIT (A). There is nothing to suggest that any prejudice will be caused to the Revenue if this direction is complied with.

Given the facts of this case, we are of the view that no substantial question of law arises for our consideration.

Dismissed.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
SEO Services SEO LLC e-boost Search Engine Optimization Services Internet Marketing Services Website Placement Services On-site Webs

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions