Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 March 31 deadline is getting near. How to save income tax with tax loss harvesting?
 45-day MSME payment rule: Impact and details of Section 43B(h) explained
 Small savings schemes that offer tax benefits of up to Rs 1.5 lakh under section 80C
 RE-OPENING OF CORRECTION WINDOW FOR MAY 2024 CA EXAMINATIONS
 Powerful Upgrades, Tally 12+1 months renewal Plan and Connected Services for your growing Business - March 2024
 How innovative solutions can help fix the Sec 43B conundrum for MSMEs
 Income Tax dept asks many individuals to explain high value transactions of FY20-21 as Updated ITR deadline nears
 Release Notes for TallyPrime and TallyPrime Edit Log Release 4.1 | What s New!
 Deadline to file updated ITR FY20-21 ends on March 31: Details on additional tax
 4 tax-planning mistakes to avoid this season
 ITR 2024: Here are 8 ways by which senior citizens can save on taxes this year

No VRS to employees facing criminal charge, rules Madurai Bench
October, 11th 2007
An employee of a co-operative society could not force the society to accept his voluntary retirement request (VRS) contrary to all norms and conditions imposed under the scheme, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has ruled.

Dismissing a writ petition from manager of Paramakudi Urban Co-op Society Ltd, challenging order rejecting his application to go on VRS introduced on 11-8-2005 and further guidelines dated 23-1-2006 of Registrar of Co-op Societies, Mr Justice K. Chandru held that petitioner (M. Nagarajan) having agreed to abide by conditions including guidelines, could not now challenge very same guidelines.

Petitioner was only an employee of co-op society and his continuation or otherwise could only be determined by society itself, and Registrar or Government did not come into the scheme. Petitioner himself admitted that he was facing criminal case filed against him which was pending before Judicial Magistrate Court 1, Ramanathapuram. In the guise of challenging the circular dated 23-1-2006, petitioner could not force society to accept his VRS request contrary to all norms and conditions imposed in this regard. There were no merits in writ petition, and hence same was dismissed.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting