Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: cpt
 
 
News Headlines »
 Filing of online return for 4th quarter of 2016-17 — extension of period thereof
 CBDT simplifies ITR filing process from FY18
 Govt extends service tax return filing date to April 30
 No move to tax farm income, clarifies Arun Jaitley
 New board for indirect taxes to become operational from June 1
  9 changes that came into effect from April 1
 First time filing income tax? Here's all you need to know about Form 16 and Form 26AS
 New Opening Financial Controller Chartered Accountant (Manufacturing Plant) A Leading Company
 Income Tax Filing 2017: All you want to know about the single page ITR form SAHAJ
 How to benefit from investments in tax saving mutual funds
 60 per cent of income tax notices on fishy cash deposits returned

Cap on number of investment cos unlikely
October, 22nd 2007

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), which is working on a new revamped Company Law, is unlikely to put a cap on number of investment companies a promoter or corporate house can float.

Official sources said that the new law, expected to be introduced in the winter session of Parliament, is likely to adopt the recommendation of the J J Irani Committee on the issue that no restrictions should be placed.

Instead, a regime for preventing misuse of this mechanism should be devised based on transparent Board processes and disclosures under close supervision of the regulator for listed companies, the committee has suggested.

In its examination of this issue, the committee had also considered the recommendations made by the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on Stock Market Scam on restricting the layers of subsidiary investment companies.

2001 scam

Armed with the experience gained out of the practice adopted by different players in the stock market scam of 2001, which had brought to the limelight the much abused investment company route for corporate control, the Government had considered restricting the number of investment companies that could be floated, in the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2003.

At that time it was felt that there was a need to plug-in the loophole that allowed corporate houses to float several investment firms, which facilitated control of the shareholding by the promoters. The Bill has since been withdrawn.

Subsequently, the issue was deliberated by the Irani committee, which in its report noted that the JPC recommendations were in context of the stock market/banking scams witnessed in India over the past decade. In the present situation, when Indian companies were seeking to make investments abroad, such restriction would adversely affect their opportunities in the face of international competition, it had observed.

The intention to bring in any restriction is that it should serve an objective. After due deliberations it was found that putting such caps are not going to serve any purpose. It was felt that protecting legitimate business activity under a regime for setting up subsidiary companies would result in special carve-outs and monitoring the activities of such companies would become an administrative nightmare. For these reasons, the Committee took the view that limiting the layers of subsidiary investment companies was not feasible, sources said.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Team

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions