Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment
 
 
News Headlines »
 Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful

Tribunal needed to oversee banking regulation
October, 30th 2006

Appellate Tribunals have often been the subject of debate in financial and business circles. One often hears bureaucrats, regulatory officials, and select commentators suggest that tribunals that interfere with regulators should not exist. This column disagrees. 
 
The case for oversight over regulators is very clear. Regulatory accountability and provision of at least one appeal to persons affected by actions of the regulator is a fundamental feature of any civil society. Today, regulators across the board are vested with a range of powers to curtail the freedom of action of members in society. Such powers are indeed important. 
 
Our regulators need to have the best ammunition in their arsenal to react, and respond to developments in society. However, just as business and financial regulators need to be empowered, there arises an equal need to legislate for oversight over the regulator. Today, Parliament has legislated for appellate tribunals to oversee the functioning of regulators in the capital markets, insurance sector, telecommunications, and even environmental regulations, but somehow has not legislated for oversight of the RBIs regulatory functions. 
 
The need for tribunals has been stark since it is crucial to ensure that judicial minds, whose only job ought to be consideration of appeals from specific regulators, are applied without distraction. 
 
Tribunals are courts for all practical purposes, and their special purpose is to adjudicate matters relating to a specific area of regulation. The law entails a certain qualification requirement for their members and a certain seniority level for judicial members. 
 
Therefore, they are specialized quasi-judicial bodies that play the role of oversight over the regulators, acting as courts do, without being fettered by complicated and technical procedures that courts have to follow. The actions of tribunals are also not without a check and balance. Decisions of appellate tribunals can always be challenged by way of appeals provided for in the laws that create them. 
 
Regulators themselves face the same issues that any public institution such as tribunals would face. They too tend to lose institutional memory with people moving within and without the regulatory organisation. Personal attitudes of individual officers and societal comment influence regulatory decisions. 
 
The RBI has started increasing the size of penalties it imposes one cannot say that the RBI is not mindful of the perception of its actions, in comparison, being gentle slaps on the wrist. It is to ensure checks and balance on the exercise of such wide-ranging powers that there is a clear need for a tribunal.  

Somasekhar Sundaresan
(The author is a partner of JSA, Advocates & Solicitors. The views expressed herein are his own)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Application Management Solutions Application Management System Application Management Software System Application Management Development Application Management Software Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions