Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt
 
 
News Headlines »
 Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful

Leg-up to bank mergers?
October, 07th 2006
The Income-Tax, Act, 1961 generally frowns upon trafficking in losses so much so that normally loss suffered by A cannot be carried forward, much less set off, by B. But Section 72A not only relaxes this thaw, but extends the normal aggregate carry forward period of losses, which is eight years, to encourage amalgamations in larger national interest. Among others, the banking sector could be a potential beneficiary of this regime, provided the amalgamated company is either the State Bank of India or its subsidiaries or any nationalised bank. Being an omnibus section catering as much to industrial undertakings as to banks, some of the conditions prescribed, while being appropriate for the former just do not make sense for the latter. For example, one of the conditions subject to which the tax benefit is available is that the amalgamated company should for a period of five years refrain from disposing of at least three-fourths of the book value of fixed assets acquired in the scheme of amalgamation. Again, one of the conditions is the amalgamating company should have held for a minimum of two years at least three-fourths of the book value of assets being transferred. The accent on fixed assets, more particularly prevention of stripping thereof, which is perfectly justified in the context of industrial undertaking, is out of place in the context of the banking sector for which fixed assets are not the pillars of their edifice. The amalgamated company loses the tax benefit should it fail to comply with the conditions prescribed in the section. In the event, if the amalgamated banking company disposes of fixed assets beyond 25 per cent during the initial five years, the loss of the amalgamating company which it has hitherto set off would be deemed to be its income in the year in which such a breach was committed. A paradox Asset stripping, which is often the primary aim of takeover tycoons, can hardly be the aim of state-controlled banks. But there seems to be an existential paradox as far as Section 72A is concerned in the context of the banking sector now that an alternative mechanism contained in Section 72AA is available to it. This section gives a no-holds-barred leg up to bank mergers devoid of the stifling conditionalities prescribed by Section 72A but only if the merger is conceived and sanctified by the Central Government. Banks in the M&A game should elicit Central Government support for its merger schemes, especially if they are driven by profiting from losses of the merging company. But in either case, the amalgamation should conform to the definition of the term given in Section 2(1B) which requires all assets and liabilities of the amalgamating company to be taken over by the amalgamated company and, more importantly, requires at least 75 per cent of the shareholders in terms of value in the amalgamating company to become the shareholders in the amalgamated company. The takeover of United Western Bank by IDBI, loosely described as amalgamation, would fail this crucial test, as what IDBI proposes to do with the shareholders of the former is to buy them off at Rs 28 per share and not make them shareholders in it. But IDBI need not lose sleep over it in case United Western has not brought any loss to the table. S. Murlidharan (The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Privacy Policy

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions